Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Nah the only limitation would need to be that you can't activate it while you have a combat timer. @ CCP & focus group - Glad to see that the warp speed bonus is being kept on the proteus chassis optimisation sub. However, don't you think it...
- by Rek Seven - at 2017.06.29 21:06:03
|
2. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Noxisia Arkana wrote: Rek Seven wrote: @Focus group, am I reading right that Fozzie has moved the warp speed bonus to the nullification subsystem? Why was it removed from the non-nullified sub? This removes the ability for a T3 to travel...
- by Rek Seven - at 2017.06.28 16:48:55
|
3. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
@Focus group, am I reading right that Fozzie has moved the warp speed bonus to the nullification subsystem? Why was it removed from the non-nullified sub? This removes the ability for a T3 to travel fast.
- by Rek Seven - at 2017.06.27 22:52:03
|
4. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I don't know if this idea has been suggested but T3C should work as follows... The cruisers should be able to be refit without the use of a mobile depot (or similar) not under a combat timer. Saved fittings should be able to be instantly applied ...
- by Rek Seven - at 2017.06.23 15:58:11
|
5. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I have been messing around with the cloaky proteus fits and it seem under-powered in comparison to the tengu... The tengu gets great DPS at great range while the proteus gets ok dps at close range only. Armour vs shield tank is also uneven when yo...
- by Rek Seven - at 2017.06.23 15:10:39
|
6. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
The tank on the covert options are garbage unless you fit a passive tank and to me, this alone indicates that the design choice behind this is flawed. So if CCP are going to stick with that, the DPS absolutely needs to be high! Don't forget that y...
- by Rek Seven - at 2017.06.23 11:37:14
|
7. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Nasar Vyron wrote: Rek Seven wrote: So the drone Proteus that currently hardly gets used is going to be made worse? Good job guys! Give it specific bonuses to medium drones only, to make it unique. The Gila would like a word with you. ...
- by Rek Seven - at 2017.06.19 10:24:01
|
8. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
So the drone Proteus that currently hardly gets used is going to be made worse? Good job guys!
- by Rek Seven - at 2017.06.18 13:47:04
|
9. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Although it is not a problem for my play style, I think that people do have legitimate concerns with regards to the cloak and scanning roles being linked. Again, I would suggest that a new line of industrial/pve subsystems are added and that the...
- by Rek Seven - at 2017.06.17 18:36:22
|
10. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Noxisia Arkana wrote: I personally think the group is very focused on trying to make sure that T3s aren't going to obsolete whole ship classes; I personally struggle with how can you make recons and HACs relevant outside of cost (or recons bet...
- by Rek Seven - at 2017.06.16 14:28:19
|
11. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Noxisia Arkana wrote: In the focus group we've mentioned that the cargohold for exploration is fairly lackluster; but as you said earlier I don't think we want to infringe on the T2 transports niche. Nothing worse than a cloaky / nullified tra...
- by Rek Seven - at 2017.06.13 15:52:16
|
12. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
@ Dior Ambraelle, you are not wrong but all i would say is that even though you may feel the T3 industrial is not needed or that we already have suitable ORE alternatives, i feel that adding these would diversify the ship class and help maintain d...
- by Rek Seven - at 2017.06.13 15:46:18
|
13. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I don't like the 7.5% rep bonus for the cloak/probe subsystem. It will either limit the use too much or will be unused when the ship is part of a fleet. It would be much better to have a resistance bonus. I'm very disappointing that CCP didn't ta...
- by Rek Seven - at 2017.06.13 10:21:23
|
14. Every year, there are less users playing, why?? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
And yet you argue with me without offering a counter point and instead resorting to name calling and pointless comments. I have said what i want to say. If you feel the need to continue this via email, feel free to do so. I'm happy to just go abo...
- by Rek Seven - at 2016.08.04 12:43:30
|
15. Every year, there are less users playing, why?? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Read the original quote idiot. Swimming is the player action, the water is the content in this analogy. The act of playing the game is not game content, it is simply interacting with the game content within the designed limits. If you believe ot...
- by Rek Seven - at 2016.08.04 12:25:36
|
16. Every year, there are less users playing, why?? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You really don't get it though and are just picking spinets of what i said to support your argument. You have started a new argument here by saying it is ok to uses a general word to replace a specific one. That was what the fruit and water anal...
- by Rek Seven - at 2016.08.04 12:07:07
|
17. Every year, there are less users playing, why?? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dirty Forum Alt wrote: If your point was that they were correct, but vague - and that they should use more precise wording...Then you should have said it. Not argued that their word was "wrong". Like i already did here you mean... Rek...
- by Rek Seven - at 2016.08.04 11:54:12
|
18. Every year, there are less users playing, why?? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dirty Forum Alt wrote: [quote=Rek Seven] Basically you heard somebody saying the swimming pool is full of liquid...and you've spent several pages arguing and trying to convince him that "NO no no no no it isn't full of liquid...its full of...um...
- by Rek Seven - at 2016.08.04 11:43:04
|
19. Every year, there are less users playing, why?? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dirty Forum Alt wrote: and explained that your position is also ridiculous. *everything in the game - player made or CCP made - is content*. I'll stop you there. I have made it clear that i do not agree with this so it's pointless to conti...
- by Rek Seven - at 2016.08.04 10:48:38
|
20. Every year, there are less users playing, why?? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No really but whatever, let's move on.
- by Rek Seven - at 2016.08.04 10:30:42
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |